Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than LG Stylo 4, getting an 86.3 score against 73.1. Even when Galaxy S10e and the LG Stylo 4 were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy S10e is a little bit thinner and lighter. The Galaxy S10e has a little sharper screen than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2280.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit better performance than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
The LG Stylo 4 has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much better camera than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 4. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S10e, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG Stylo 4, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.