Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a lot better than LG Stylo 4, with a global score of 94.8 against 73.1. Galaxy S20's design is newer, a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the LG Stylo 4. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little bit better processing power than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a better looking screen than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a better count of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S20 counts with a greater camera than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a back facing camera with less MP, it also counts with a much better video definition and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S20 has longer battery lifetime than LG Stylo 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 4. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Stylo 4, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.