Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is way better than LG Stylo 4's 73.1 general score. Galaxy S20 FE's construction is noticeably newer than LG Stylo 4's, although it is a bit thicker and a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better looking screen than LG Stylo 4, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit higher display density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better processor than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much bigger memory for games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE has longer battery lifetime than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way better camera than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG Stylo 4, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.