Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than LG Stylo 4's score of 73.1. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is newer, but a lot heavier and just a little thicker than LG Stylo 4. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a more vivid screen than LG Stylo 4, because it has a greater pixel count per inch in the screen, a quite larger display and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better processing unit than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back facing camera with a much better 108 MP resolution and a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better battery life than LG Stylo 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Stylo 4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG Stylo 4, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.