Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the LG Stylo 4, with a score of 95.4 against 73.1. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer device than the LG Stylo 4, although it's incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better processing power than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than LG Stylo 4, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, more pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger screen. The LG Stylo 4 features a superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than LG Stylo 4, because it has a larger aperture, a way better 108 MP resolution camera in the back and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better battery life than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 4. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some money and get the LG Stylo 4, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.