Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is way better than the LG Stylo 4, getting an 88.5 score against 73.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is newer and somewhat thinner than LG Stylo 4's, although it is just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little more vivid screen than LG Stylo 4, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2636px resolution, a little bigger display and a quite higher pixels amount per inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a little better processing power than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than LG Stylo 4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
LG Stylo 4 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip both count with very similar battery durations. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes much better photos and videos than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a way better (4K) video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 4. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Stylo 4, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.