Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 129.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than the LG Stylo 4, with a 92.3 score against 73.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is notably newer and somewhat thinner than LG Stylo 4's, although it is a little bit heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior processing unit than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better looking display than LG Stylo 4, because it has a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of screen, a little bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior camera than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a much better 3840x2160 video quality. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery duration is very similar to the LG Stylo 4 one.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, else you can save some dollars and get the LG Stylo 4, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.