Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the LG Stylo 4, with a 94.6 score against 73.1. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is heavier than the LG Stylo 4, it's somewhat thinner and also way newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than LG Stylo 4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better performing processor than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has improved battery lifetime than LG Stylo 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior camera than LG Stylo 4, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Stylo 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Stylo 4. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Stylo 4, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.