Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-18 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is much better than LG Stylo 4's global score of 73.1. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is newer, but a bit thicker and a lot heavier than LG Stylo 4. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little faster CPU than LG Stylo 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better display than LG Stylo 4, because it has a quite larger display, a quite higher amount of pixels per display inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior camera than LG Stylo 4, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera, a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and video and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
LG Stylo 4 features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than LG Stylo 4, because it has a 42% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.