Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is slightly better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 overall score. Although the Google Pixel 2 XL is extremely older than the LG Stylo 6, it's design is a bit thinner and lighter. Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit better looking display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL and LG Stylo 6 both feature quite similar CPUs, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. Google Pixel 2 XL captures a bit better photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera with a worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 2 XL also counts with a lot better video definition and a larger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3520mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.