Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than LG Stylo 6, with an 80.7 score against 76.7. Google Pixel 3 XL is an older device than LG Stylo 6, but it's just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little faster processor than LG Stylo 6. They have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a slightly better looking display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater screen density. Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP, and they both have the same aperture, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality and a bigger camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
LG Stylo 6 has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.