Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than LG Stylo 6, having a 78.8 score against 76.7. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has the newer 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 3a is older than the LG Stylo 6, it's body is a little thinner and way lighter.
LG Stylo 6 features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a has a little sharper screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a little higher pixels quantity per inch in the display.
The LG Stylo 6 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 counts with better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a slightly better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Google Pixel 3a also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3a is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.