Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Holographic white | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than LG Stylo 6, getting a overall score of 82.9 against 76.7. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features and a performance increase. The Google Pixel 4a is a just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter phone than the LG Stylo 6, even though both were released only a few months apart.
The Google Pixel 4a's processor is just as good as the LG Stylo 6 one, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Google Pixel 4a features a little more vivid screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
The LG Stylo 6 features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 features improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a features a slightly better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher video definition.
Google Pixel 4a is way more expensive than LG Stylo 6, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.