Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Holographic white | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than the LG Stylo 6's 76.7 overall score. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a bit thinner and incredibly lighter phone than LG Stylo 6, even though both were released with only 6 months difference. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better looking display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of display. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit more powerful processor than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM.
The LG Stylo 6 has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4a 5G takes better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
LG Stylo 6 features a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more than the LG Stylo 6, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.