Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Holographic white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is better than the LG Stylo 6's global score of 76.7. Even though Google Pixel 5 and the LG Stylo 6 were released only a few months apart, Google Pixel 5 is way lighter and just a little thinner. Google Pixel 5 counts with a little better hardware performance than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 5 features a slightly better display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch. Google Pixel 5 captures much clearer photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera with less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures in low light situations, a much higher video resolution and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 5 features a bit superior battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.