Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is slightly better than LG Stylo 6's score of 76.7. Although HTC One M9 is extremely older and thicker than the LG Stylo 6, it's design is still a lot lighter. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10.
HTC One M9 has a bit better processing unit than LG Stylo 6, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bits CPU. HTC One M9 has a better looking display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
HTC One M9 captures much clearer photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much more MP camera in the back, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. LG Stylo 6 has a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
The HTC One M9 is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.