Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Holographic white | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than LG Stylo 6, getting a score of 77 against 76.7. The HTC U Ultra is an incredibly older cellphone than the LG Stylo 6, but HTC managed to build it much lighter and just a little thinner. LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the LG Stylo 6 also has a higher number of cores.
HTC U Ultra features a bit sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The HTC U Ultra features as much memory capacity for games and applications as the LG Stylo 6, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Stylo 6 features better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. HTC U Ultra shoots clearer videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG Stylo 6, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.