Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is a little bit better than the LG Stylo 6, getting a 77.6 score against 76.7. The HTC U11 is an a lot older cellphone than LG Stylo 6, but HTC was able to make it extremely lighter and just a little thinner anyway. HTC U11 counts with a little bit better looking screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
HTC U11 counts with just a bit better processing power than LG Stylo 6. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The HTC U11 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 features superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although HTC U11 is a better device, it costs more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 6. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG Stylo 6, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.