Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Holographic white | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the LG Stylo 6's 76.7 score. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some nice extra features and performance tweaks. The LG V30S ThinQ design is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than the LG Stylo 6, although it was released 2 years before.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater pixels density.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bigger storage for games and applications than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more internal storage. The LG Stylo 6 counts with greater battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a higher 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 6. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the LG Stylo 6, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.