Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the LG Stylo 6, with an 81.3 score against 76.7. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than the LG Stylo 6, even though it was released many years before. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The LG V35 ThinQ and LG Stylo 6 feature very similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and the same 64 GB internal storage.
The LG Stylo 6 has superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ takes slightly better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, it also counts with a more megapixels back camera, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than LG Stylo 6, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.