Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Holographic white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than LG Stylo 6, with an 87.1 score against 76.7. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than LG Stylo 6, but it's somewhat lighter.
The LG Stylo 6 features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than LG Stylo 6, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better memory to store more apps and games than LG Stylo 6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG Stylo 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light images, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lot better resolution camera in the back and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.