Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Holographic white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a general score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than LG Stylo 6's score of 76.7. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play is an much older phone than LG Stylo 6, but Motorola managed to make it notably thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The LG Stylo 6 counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The Moto Z2 Play's memory capacity to install games and applications is very similar to LG Stylo 6's one, both have equal internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a slightly better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lesser MP camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. LG Stylo 6 has better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola Moto Z2 Play is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.