Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Holographic white | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 is just a bit better than the LG Stylo 6, with a 77.6 score against 76.7. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features and improved performance. Even though Moto Z3 is older than LG Stylo 6, it's construction is much thinner and incredibly lighter.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit better CPU than LG Stylo 6. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Moto Z3 has a screen that is just as good as the screen in LG Stylo 6, because although the Moto Z3 has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
Motorola Moto Z3 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a back facing camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger sensor capturing better quality photos and videos.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the LG Stylo 6 one, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and the same 64 GB internal memory capacity. LG Stylo 6 features longer battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Motorola Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG Stylo 6, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.