Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Holographic white | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is just a bit better than LG Stylo 6, with a score of 78.5 against 76.7. Motorola One Action is an older and a little thicker phone than LG Stylo 6, but Motorola was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. Motorola One Action has a little bit better display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better display density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520px.
The LG Stylo 6 has a little faster processor than Motorola One Action. Both of them have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Motorola One Action has a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola One Action captures a bit better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Action also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The LG Stylo 6 has a bit superior battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs more money than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola One Action, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.