Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Holographic white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than LG Stylo 6, with a general score of 79.8 against 76.7. These devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10. Even though Motorola One Hyper and LG Stylo 6 were released only 6 months apart, Motorola One Hyper's construction is just a bit lighter but also a little bit thicker.
The LG Stylo 6 has a little faster processor than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores. LG Stylo 6 features a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution.
Motorola One Hyper features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Hyper shoots much better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light captures, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Motorola One Hyper's battery performance is very similar to the battery life in LG Stylo 6.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG Stylo 6, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.