Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Holographic white | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than LG Stylo 6, getting a overall score of 80 against 76.7. Even though the Motorola One Zoom and the LG Stylo 6 were released with only 9 months difference, the Motorola One Zoom construction is somewhat lighter but just a little thicker. LG Stylo 6 features just a bit better performance than Motorola One Zoom. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit bigger display. The LG Stylo 6 features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola One Zoom features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the LG Stylo 6 one. Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior camera than LG Stylo 6, because it has a way larger back camera sensor, a way better resolution camera, a larger aperture and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG Stylo 6, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.