Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Holographic white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version. Although Motorola razr (2020) and the LG Stylo 6 were only released with a couple months difference, Motorola razr (2020) is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner.
LG Stylo 6 counts with just a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little better amount of pixels in each display inch, a higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bigger display. The LG Stylo 6 counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit superior CPU than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) has a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a bigger aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), else you can save some dollars and get the LG Stylo 6, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.