Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Holographic white | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a general score of 76.7 against 75.8. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but LG Stylo 6 has 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though LG Stylo 6 and nubia Red Magic 3S were released only 7 months apart, LG Stylo 6's construction is a little heavier but somewhat thinner.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better performance than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a screen that's very similar to the display in LG Stylo 6, although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit less pixels per screen inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a way better video resolution and a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos. The LG Stylo 6 features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery lifetime than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG Stylo 6 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.