Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 has a general score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than the LG Stylo 6's 76.7 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A30 construction is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than LG Stylo 6, despite of the fact that it was released only 15 months before. LG Stylo 6 features a bit better processor than Galaxy A30. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG Stylo 6 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a bit worse pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A30 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A30 also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images, a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The LG Stylo 6 has a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy A30, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 and Samsung Galaxy A30 both have very similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.