Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Holographic white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A31 construction has the same thickness than the LG Stylo 6, but it is lighter. These phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Galaxy A31 features a display that's just as good as the display in LG Stylo 6, because although the Galaxy A31 has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density.
The LG Stylo 6 features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A31. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy A31 counts with a better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a way better 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A31 has improved battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.