Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the LG Stylo 6, having a global score of 83.8 against 76.7. Galaxy A50's construction is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the LG Stylo 6, although it was released around a year before. The LG Stylo 6 and the Samsung Galaxy A50 both have extremely similar processors, they have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a screen that's just as good as LG Stylo 6's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels per display inch. Galaxy A50 has a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a back facing camera with a lot better 25 mega pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light situations and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50's battery performance is very similar to the LG Stylo 6 one.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also the cheapest, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.