Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Holographic white | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than LG Stylo 6, getting a general score of 90.7 against 76.7. Galaxy A52's construction is newer, somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG Stylo 6. The LG Stylo 6 and the Galaxy A52 feature similar processors, and although the Galaxy A52 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
LG Stylo 6 and Samsung Galaxy A52 feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixels number in each inch of display. Galaxy A52 captures much better videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot higher video definition, a camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Galaxy A52 features just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than LG Stylo 6, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.