Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Holographic white | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 general score. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG Stylo 6. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, so it provides you lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
LG Stylo 6 and Galaxy A52 5G have really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel count per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and LG Stylo 6 both count with quite similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better battery duration than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a lot better camera than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a way better resolution back facing camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.