Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Holographic white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is much better than LG Stylo 6, getting a overall score of 91.1 against 76.7. The Galaxy A52s is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than LG Stylo 6. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and better performance.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a bit better hardware performance than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG Stylo 6 and the Galaxy A52s both feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A52s has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
Galaxy A52s has a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a much more mega pixels camera and a lot larger sensor. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A52s features just a bit better battery duration than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.