Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Stylo 6 has a general score of 76.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 overall score. The LG Stylo 6 body is much newer than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, but it is heavier and a little thicker. The LG Stylo 6 features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Stylo 6 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG Stylo 6 features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bigger display, a just a little higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460. The Galaxy A7 (2017) shoots clearer photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A7 (2017) also counts with a better resolution camera in the back.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The LG Stylo 6 features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.