Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 general score. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A70 is older than LG Stylo 6, it's construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). LG Stylo 6 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A70, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG Stylo 6 has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460, a bit greater display pixels density and a bit larger display. The LG Stylo 6 has a way better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture and a tinier back camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A70 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG Stylo 6, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.