Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Holographic white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is better than LG Stylo 6, with a overall score of 87.5 against 76.7. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has a newer 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, providing a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. Samsung Galaxy A71's design is thinner and somewhat lighter than LG Stylo 6, even when both were released only 4 months apart.
The LG Stylo 6 has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A71, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, a bit greater pixels number per inch of screen and a little bigger display. The LG Stylo 6 and the Galaxy A71 both feature extremely similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A71 has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A71 has a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The LG Stylo 6 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A71 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.