Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is just a bit better than the LG Stylo 6, with a 79.2 score against 76.7. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)'s body is incredibly lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG Stylo 6, although it was released many years before. LG Stylo 6 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018). Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A8 (2018) has a little more vivid display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel count in each inch of display. Galaxy A8 (2018) shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A8 (2018) also has a camera in the back with a better 16 megapixels resolution and a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
LG Stylo 6 features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 has improved battery life than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.