Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Holographic white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than LG Stylo 6, with a global score of 97.6 against 76.7. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance improvements. Even though Galaxy Fold and LG Stylo 6 were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Fold design is heavier but extremely thinner.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Fold features a superior memory to install games and applications than LG Stylo 6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little longer battery lifetime than LG Stylo 6, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a larger camera aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.