Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Holographic white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the LG Stylo 6's 76.7 score. The Galaxy Note 20 body is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than LG Stylo 6, although both were released with only a couple months difference. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better processing power than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a display that is just as good as the LG Stylo 6 one, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a just a bit worse pixels number in each display inch, a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit smaller screen. The Galaxy Note 20 takes much better photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way better video quality and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
LG Stylo 6 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some money and buy the LG Stylo 6, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.