Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is just a bit better than LG Stylo 6, having a global score of 79.3 against 76.7. The Galaxy Note 5 body is somewhat thinner and way lighter than the LG Stylo 6, even though it was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Note 5 features a brighter screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixel amount per inch of display. The LG Stylo 6 has a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has a larger number of faster cores. LG Stylo 6 counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with just a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a more megapixels back camera and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Although Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 6. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 5, else you can save some money and get the LG Stylo 6, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.