Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than LG Stylo 6, getting a score of 80.4 against 76.7. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction is just a little bit thinner and a lot lighter than LG Stylo 6, although it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's CPU is very similar to the LG Stylo 6 one, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit sharper screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better count of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lesser megapixels camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG Stylo 6, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.