Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Holographic white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the LG Stylo 6, with a 98 score against 76.7. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version, so it gives you lots of additional features and better performance. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the LG Stylo 6.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a quite larger screen and a better 1440 x 3200px resolution. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better CPU than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much larger sensor, a much higher video resolution and a back camera with a much higher resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than LG Stylo 6, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with greater battery life than LG Stylo 6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.