Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Holographic white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than LG Stylo 6, having a 95.4 score against 76.7. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than LG Stylo 6, it is just a little thicker and a little heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit faster processing unit than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much higher video resolution, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor. The LG Stylo 6 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has greater battery lifetime than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG Stylo 6, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.