Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-20 | -- |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Holographic white | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than LG Stylo 6, having a overall score of 82.6 against 76.7. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and extremely lighter device than the LG Stylo 6. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, so it offers some extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. The LG Stylo 6 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Stylo 6 features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S25's battery performance is just as good as the LG Stylo 6 one. The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots greater photos and videos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a much more megapixels back camera, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG Stylo 6, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.