Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Holographic white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Stylo 6 is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 Active, getting a overall score of 76.7 against 75.8. LG Stylo 6's design is notably newer and thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a much better looking screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
LG Stylo 6 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG Stylo 6 also has a higher number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a slightly better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The LG Stylo 6 has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S7 Active's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery lifetime in LG Stylo 6.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG Stylo 6 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.