Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Holographic white | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 233.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is slightly better than the LG Stylo 6's score of 76.7. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's body weights the same than LG Stylo 6, but it is somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's CPU is very similar to the CPU in LG Stylo 6, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. LG Stylo 6 and Galaxy XCover Pro feature extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel amount per inch in the display.
The Galaxy XCover Pro takes a little bit better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lot tinier sensor, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
LG Stylo 6 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 1 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you want to save some money, you can get LG Stylo 6, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.