Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Holographic white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than LG Stylo 6, having a 92.3 score against 76.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and LG Stylo 6 were released only a few months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, offering some nice extra features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit faster processing unit than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little sharper screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little better amount of pixels in each display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality pictures and a way better (4K) video quality.
The LG Stylo 6 features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.