Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Holographic white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 233.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the LG Stylo 6, having a 94.6 score against 76.7. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the LG Stylo 6 were only released with a couple of months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is extremely thinner but also noticeably heavier than the LG Stylo 6. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more powerful CPU than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a display that is very similar to LG Stylo 6's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better battery duration than LG Stylo 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG Stylo 6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG Stylo 6, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.