Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-08 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Titan gray |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than LG V10's score of 77.7. Even though the LG K92 is a little heavier than LG V10, it's just a bit thinner and a lot newer. LG K92 counts with a bit more powerful processor than LG V10, because it has 2 more cores and more RAM.
The LG V10 has a little bit better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen. LG K92 shoots much better videos and photos than LG V10, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size camera aperture, the LG K92 also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a back camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG K92 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG V10, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 64 GB more internal storage. LG K92 counts with greater battery life than LG V10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG K92 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.